A Nonentity Writes

Over the past several decades, the Korean judiciary has been criticized for making politically motivated decisions in cases that should have been decided solely on the basis of law. Criticized for violating political neutrality, the judiciary is now perceived as an institution in need of reform, effectively facing a serious crisis. The prosecution services in South Korea also began to undergo reform and reorganization due to cases in which prosecutors indicted people with the intention of intimidating the public or cases in which the decisions to prosecute was made based on political interests rather than the law. Concerned about the corruption of the judiciary, fueled by judges' bargaining and prosecutors' abuse of their power to prosecute, the Korean public is demanding that the entire legal system reflect and reform. Meanwhile, a Korean lawyer has been caught committing a serious crime that goes beyond legal ethics and undermines the very foundation of the judicial system, s...

log date: 2025-9-1 A partial amendment to the Public Official Election Act has been proposed in South Korea, raising concerns about serious harm to the public interest. The bill(amendment), co-sponsored by twelve lawmakers, was proposed on August 19, 2025. The notice period for its enactment ends on September 3, 2025. If there are few objections, it will be referred to a subcommittee of the Public Administration and Security Committee for deliberation. Source: The Legislative Information System in South Korea The scope of the proposed new provision is overly vague and broad. Simply pointing out injustices or flaws in the current Public Official Election Act and electoral system could result in the punishment of innocent citizens, a serious infringement on citizens' freedom of expression. For instance, the falsity of messages contained in the banners must be verified through investigation. However, the National Election Commission (NEC) reportedly refuses to disclose any election-re...